Same mall, disconnected lists
Shoppers re-register per store; operators lack a shared, permissioned view.
For shopping centres and large retail complexes: connect tenant membership under clear boundaries, observe footfall and spend signals the operator is entitled to use, and keep each merchant’s guest list with that merchant. Alliance identity can be recognised across tenants without transferring relationships.
Shoppers re-register per store; operators lack a shared, permissioned view.
Campaign guests leave with the marketplace, not the centre.
Hard for SMEs tenants; neighbourhood local-life synergy stays weak.
One identity recognised across participating tenants.
Real purchase or visit at that shop.
Each shop keeps its own membership boundary.
Centre-level dashboards only where access is granted.
Tenants fear list siphoning; SME rollout is slow.
Hard to build lasting centre–tenant–guest ties.
Recognise across tenants; each shop keeps its list.
Same membership boundaries; optional records and a merchant-confirmed public store page. Indexing is decided by search engines.
Checkable redemptions for rhythm and follow-up.Operating records →
Preview first; public only after confirmation.AI store site →
Either model can apply; org and data scope are confirmed at onboarding.
No free-for-all. Other merchants cannot take a shop’s list; operator views follow agreed permissions.
No software monthly fee to connect. Campaign outcomes still depend on operations and channels.
Membership uses a phone code; whether to adjust POS flow depends on enabled features.
Log into the merchant console and follow the on-screen steps.
Merchant login